Learning in Activity

Situative approach  consist cognitive science and interactional studies. Situative approach should be similtaneous. Cognitive science explain how construct the knowledge on pupils’ mind. And individual cognitive approach interest in how can the knowledge construct,store,retrieve, and change(mental activities). We can say that all of them are information structures and process. If we give examples about cognitive science, we say problem solving, reading, answering question, study texts, respond to stimulus. Interactional studies interest in how student comminucate  to eachother . In this most important items are;develop predictions, data collecting, discuss,  hypotheses, create images,develop or build a model and something like that.Situative research take into account ;features of activity systems, participants , material and technological tools, informational structures , softwares and environment and so on. Thus situative approach analyze all level activity systems. Situative integrate cognitive and interactional study of  most significant feature. In this way, students will creative, collobrative and sharing. Students construct and express their report  especially they present verbal reports.Students improve comrehending, understanding and questioning. I mean that situative is effective  and meaningful in science classroom. Students interact with teacher and eachother. They could  apply like ArchiTect, Antartica,and artificial blood vessel project. My questions;

In this research didn’t mention that classroom homogenous and students’ age ,gender and something like that what do you think about this topics in situative perspective?

If the classroom activity isn’t similtaneous, what can we do according to this approach?