Opinions about the article “CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING APPROACH IN SCIENCE TEACHING”

The differences between constructivist learning and conventional approach is defined in this article. The research had done to check the compatibility of the theses stated in article. And the results of that research shows that there is a lot of differences between the these approaches. But in my opinion the research is not performed with “calibrated” instruments. For example test group and the control group is not accustomed to constructivist learning approach environment and they probably act or pay more attention because of the “unusual” environment so it would be better if the experiment is done with early class. Also the teacher should be chosen between more “inexperienced” or in another word young which has less prejudices. By this way results will be more close to realty. As stated in passage the questions are clear;

      1)   What if the students would be younger or in early class, is the result will be same or not?

      2)  Which qualification must have the teacher, participated in this resource, for objectivity.