Constructivism which has different parts in itself thinkable a complex method of teaching. Constructivist approach was formed as a result of the merger of philosophy,sociology, antropology ,cognitive psychology and education. Thanks to constructivist approach , students have increasing willingness which became to learning and is proved retention of learned information.
Although the meaning of constructivism varies according to one's perspective, constructivism generally stated that same thing. Students adopt information they are provided in combination with their own knowledge.
I would like to add that " In this instance don't come into mind that teachers' task given to students. On the contrary , teachers should make further effort according to the traditional approach. Teachers have to make a lot of duties such as organize information in accordance with the interests of students." Also students , this informations must be associated with their previous data.
In this article , Demirci declared that a study had be done by Şengül in 2006. Besides this study , Demirci also mentions studies that have been made previously.As a result of these studies , efforts for constructivism were obtained similar result. And if parallel efforts are made , similar results will be obtained.
I wonder these questions :
1 - ) Why Demirci didn't mentioned that in constructivism, teachers should make further effort according to the traditional approach ?
2 - ) Demirci said that " Teacher of the experimental group was educated on how the science education is treated with constructivistlearning approach before the application." But , Why she isn't explain that how this education is done ?
3 - ) What problems were encountered in this study ?
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.