In this
chapter the evaluation of “Conceptual Change Research” in education science is being
investigated. In the article that clearly stated that many areas in the
sciences, from elementary school through university level, have this
characteristic, including, in physics, concepts of matter and density, Newtonian
mechanics, electricity, and relativity; in biology, evolution and genetics. To
learn such topics, students must go through a conceptual change. Conceptual
change contrasts with less problematic learning such as skill acquisition and
acquisition of facts, where difficulty may be evident, but for more apparent
reasons such as sheer mass of learning, or the necessity of practice to produce
quick, error free, highly refined performance.
Conceptual
change is among the most central areas in the learning sciences for several reasons.
First, many of the most important ideas in science seem to be affected by the
challenges of problematic learning. Conceptual change also engages some of the deepest,
most persistent theoretical issues concerning learning. What is knowledge in its
various forms? When and why is it difficult to acquire? What is deep
understanding; how can it be fostered? Conceptual change is important not only
to education but also to developmental psychology, epistemology, and the
history and philosophy of science.
1) Is there
any benefits, come from misconceptions during education?
2)Is it
possible to use the misconceptions like anchor?
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder
Not: Yalnızca bu blogun üyesi yorum gönderebilir.